MCP security report
x402.qsig.net
A94/100
Security grade ANo obvious red flags in the tools we could see.
Connected ✓5 tools scanned
https://x402.qsig.net/mcp
low
Not on gate's verified list
This server isn't on gate's handpicked list. That's not necessarily bad, but there's no third-party signal about it — review its tools carefully.
lowget_georisk
Paid x402 route with no spend cap or user confirmation mentioned
The tool description instructs calling get_track_record first but does not require explicit user confirmation before spending real USDC via x402. An agent could autonomously incur repeated small charges without the user's awareness. This is a minor capability/cost concern rather than manipulation, but should be flagged for review of spend controls.
lowget_geo_themes
Paid x402 route with no spend cap or user confirmation mentioned
Same as get_georisk: the tool nudges the agent toward a free call first but doesn't enforce user consent before each paid call, risking unexpected micro-charges if invoked repeatedly.
Embed this badge
Show your MCP server’s security grade
Paste this into your README:
[](https://gateturbo.com/report/5c72b0dc-0725-4c48-9937-d5eea544c4f3)Scanned 10/4/2026 · This is a point-in-time snapshot of the server’s public tools. Re-scan.
Connect this server safely with gate.
Continuous re-scans, drift alerts, per-tool allow/ask/block, and a log of every call.
Monitor it — free