https://mcp-factory.bowling-anthony.workers.dev/webhook-signature-fixture-lab/mcp
mediumwebhook_signature_fixture_lab
References secrets or data exfiltration
The tool text references credentials, environment variables, or sending data elsewhere. This can be legitimate, but review what this tool actually accesses.
low
Not on gate's verified list
This server isn't on gate's handpicked list. That's not necessarily bad, but there's no third-party signal about it — review its tools carefully.
lowwebhook_signature_fixture_lab
Accepts secret material as plain input parameter
The tool requires a 'test_secret' string passed directly in the tool call. Even though described as 'customer-owned TEST secret' and 'never returned in output', there is no enforcement mechanism visible to ensure a real production secret isn't mistakenly supplied by the agent or user, which could then be processed/logged by the MCP host or transport layer. Consider recommending only synthetic/test secrets and clarifying that logging of tool inputs may still capture the secret.
lowwebhook_signature_fixture_lab
Per-call monetary charge disclosed in description
The description embeds a pricing claim ('Price: 0.03 USDC per completed bounded job on Base') inside the tool description rather than metadata. This is not itself malicious, but embedding billing/business logic in a description string read by the agent could be used to influence agent behavior (e.g., to justify unnecessary calls) or could be spoofed by other tools; worth confirming this pricing claim is enforced out-of-band and not just asserted via text the agent trusts blindly.